Persian to Azerbaijani: recover the head noun before unpacking its endings
Persian links can remain unwritten
Persian ketāb-e man identifies my book, while daftar-e ostād identifies the professor’s notebook in the Texas lesson. In both constructions the head noun comes before the following possessor. The connecting ezāfe after a consonant is normally pronounced without being written as an independent letter. A translator must therefore recognize a relationship that is not necessarily visible as a separate token.
For Azerbaijani output, counting written Persian words or searching for an explicit equivalent of of will not reliably recover that relationship. A short item label can contain a head and an owner even though there is no independent linking word to translate. Losing the link would turn an identified person’s notebook into a disconnected mention of a notebook and a professor.
An Azerbaijani word can package several distinct decisions
The Universal Dependencies description presents Azerbaijani nominal inflection in the order noun, plural marker, possessive marking and case. Those slots describe different contributions. Plural marking concerns the items named by the noun, possessive marking concerns their relationship to a possessor, and case concerns the larger construction in which the noun phrase participates.
This difference is useful when Persian identifies several objects belonging to one person. The target’s item-number marking must not be mistaken for a plural owner, and a following case ending must not be interpreted as part of that owner’s name. The Persian relationship needs to survive even if Azerbaijani expresses some of its information inside a longer written word.
The reverse diagnostic also helps assess an output: a compact target word is not necessarily missing a Persian word merely because the visible word count has decreased. The meaningful question is whether it retains the object’s number, the intended possessor and its sentence role. Word-for-word length matching cannot establish that.
Not every Persian ezāfe chain names an owner
The Texas lesson separately uses ezāfe for adjectives and naming. Its film-e xub describes a good film rather than a film belonging to someone named Good. Before selecting Azerbaijani possessive morphology, determine whether the Persian dependent is a person, a description, or a naming expression. The sound of the Persian connector does not choose among them.
A document label can make the distinction consequential. The professor’s notebook identifies a relationship to a person; a description of a good film identifies a quality. Treating both as identical possessive inputs could assign an invented possessor to the film. Treating both as simple description could instead remove the professor from the notebook’s identification.
For this direction, the reliable unit is the complete nominal relationship. Start with what is being named, distinguish descriptive information from a possessor, and preserve its role in the sentence. Azerbaijani can then organize number, possession and case in its own nominal structure without requiring the Persian ezāfe sound to survive as a separate target word.
Language references