Lower Sorbian to Odia: changing the question’s order can change its focus
A source question need not contain a separate question word
Stone illustrates Lower Sorbian Nan jo doma as a statement that father is at home, and Jo nan doma? as the corresponding question. His grammar also describes questions marked through intonation. The initial jo in the second example belongs to the source verb construction; its position helps distinguish the question.
Syed and Dash’s Odia research gives Raamo bohi Ta kiNila ki? as a neutral question asking whether Ram bought the book. Here the final ki is a question particle. It cannot be placed first simply because the Lower Sorbian example places its finite verb before the subject.
For an original source enquiry about whether a person has arrived, preserve the request for confirmation. A target statement with a question mark is not automatically the researched particle construction, and a source initial verb is not a dictionary equivalent of the target final particle. Identify the whole question pattern rather than aligning first words.
Confirmation is different from selecting one alternative
The Odia paper contrasts its neutral final-particle example with a medial-particle construction focusing on the purchased object. The latter asks whether a book, rather than some alternative, was what Ram bought. Changing the particle’s position can therefore introduce a contrast absent from an ordinary confirmation question.
Pankau’s Lower Sorbian material separately includes questions with an interrogative modifier separated from its noun. His discussion is specifically about colloquial varieties. Such a source question asks for information about an item or quantity; it should not be reduced to a general yes-or-no enquiry merely because an unfamiliar question element appears early.
Compare an original source request asking whether the book was bought with one asking which book was bought. The first can be answered by confirmation or denial; the second requires identification. A target sequence that preserves buying and book but changes the question’s informational demand would fail despite retaining the main content words.
Reported questions add another structural layer
Stone identifies Lower Sorbian lec as a conjunction introducing indirect yes/no questions. A reported enquiry can therefore contain material before its embedded clause that differs from the question’s ordinary direct formulation. Translate that embedding relationship rather than assuming every early question-related element occupies the same target position.
Syed and Dash show an Odia reported question with one ki introducing the embedded material and another at the end functioning as the question particle. Their analysis distinguishes these homophonous elements. The repeated form need not be an accidental duplication that should be deleted.
For an original Lower Sorbian report that someone asked whether a purchase occurred, preserve both the act of asking and the uncertainty about the purchase. The target should not assert the purchase as fact, replace whether with a request for the object’s identity, or remove a legitimate structural element merely because two target forms look alike. Those choices concern different levels of the sentence.
Language references