Lower Sorbian to Burmese: who wants to come and whom someone wants to meet
The unknown person can occupy different roles
A Lower Sorbian planning exchange may ask who wants to come, or ask whom a particular visitor wants to meet. The first question identifies the person with the wish. The second already identifies that person and asks about the intended meeting partner. A Burmese translation must preserve that difference.
NIU’s Burmese lesson contrasts a who question accompanying a verb with a construction containing the postposition for with. Its example “ဘယ်သူ လာချင်သလဲ။” asks who wants to come. The postpositional pattern instead asks about the other participant in an intended activity.
If the Lower Sorbian writer is assigning appointments, exchanging these roles changes the task. Asking for the name of the willing visitor will not identify the person that visitor needs to see. The same who vocabulary is insufficient unless the whole construction asks for the intended answer.
A companion is not automatically an additional subject
Stone’s Lower Sorbian pronoun paradigm includes forms used with prepositions, alongside nominative forms. The grammatical relationship around a person reference is therefore part of the source analysis. A name or pronoun inside a with phrase should not automatically become the subject of the action.
For a visitor who plans to speak with a colleague, keep the planner and the colleague distinct. A translation that asks what the colleague wants may introduce a preference the source never attributes to that person. The colleague can be the intended meeting partner without being the person proposing it.
The NIU examples illustrate this relationship in conversational Burmese. Two English glosses on the page incorrectly use what where the Burmese pattern and lesson explanation concern who; those glosses should not turn a person-seeking question into an object-seeking one. Read the example with its stated construction.
Likewise, do not infer that a meeting partner shares the visitor’s wishes. Wanting to meet someone does not establish that the other person has agreed. A scheduling message may still need a separate confirmation.
Willingness and ability are different answers to a plan
The Burmese lesson separately lists verbal particles for wanting to perform an action and being able to perform it. A Lower Sorbian message saying someone wants to attend should not become a guarantee that attendance is possible. Desire is only one part of the arrangement.
A visitor can want an appointment while lacking transport. Another person may be able to attend but prefer a different day. Preserving those distinctions helps the organizer decide whether to offer practical help, another date or simply wait for acceptance.
Also retain actual participant counts. Lower Sorbian distinguishes dual and plural personal forms in Stone’s paradigm, while respectful wy can address one person or two. Establish the intended people from the source rather than assuming every plural-looking form describes a larger visiting group.
A useful final reading asks what the recipient should supply: the willing person’s identity, the desired meeting partner, or confirmation that the plan is feasible. Then check who holds the wish and how many participants the message actually establishes. This keeps a Lower Sorbian planning question from becoming a different Burmese enquiry despite retaining familiar names and action words.
Language references