Lower Sorbian to Japanese: a relative clause moves before the noun it identifies
Find the noun that the added description belongs to
Stone illustrates Lower Sorbian relative clauses with kenž, including a statement about all those who have come. The relative expression helps attach an additional clause to the people being identified. Japanese can organize that relationship differently: Tae Kim’s grammar places a modifying verb clause directly before its head noun. The translation may therefore reverse the order of noun and description.
For a Lower Sorbian instruction identifying a person through something they did, locate that person’s head noun before translating the surrounding clause. If the Japanese action description is left after the noun merely to preserve source sequence, its grammatical connection can become unclear. Moving the description is part of retaining the relationship.
A target word meaning who is not always required
Kim illustrates いつも勉強する人, a person who always studies. The modifying expression precedes 人 without a separate equivalent of the English relative who. A Lower Sorbian kenž should therefore not trigger insertion of a Japanese question word simply because both can be glossed who in other contexts.
The distinction matters for a source that identifies the participant rather than asks their identity. A relative clause narrows or describes the person already involved in a larger statement. A question asks which person is involved. Inserting a question expression into the target because a source relative resembles an interrogative can change the sentence’s purpose.
Stone notes that Sorbian relative pronouns are often related to interrogative forms. That historical or morphological relationship does not remove their construction-specific function. Read the Lower Sorbian clause boundary and the noun being modified, then choose the Japanese modifying structure rather than translating each pronoun through its isolated dictionary gloss.
Negation inside the description belongs to that description
Kim also gives 学生じゃない人, a person who is not a student, and a longer example about someone who did not eat dinner and then went somewhere. The negative description precedes the person noun; a different predicate expresses the subsequent movement. This shows why a target negative must remain attached to the intended subordinate description.
If a Lower Sorbian instruction identifies the person who did not complete a task, moving its description before the Japanese noun must not turn the main instruction into a prohibition. The uncompleted task identifies the person; the requested action is another predicate. Preserving both clauses while exchanging their negative scope gives the reader a different instruction.
Lower Sorbian analytic negatives can place negation on an auxiliary, as Stone explains. The visible position of that source negative is therefore not a direct guide to where the Japanese negative morphology should appear. Establish which source predicate is denied before rebuilding the noun-modifying clause.
The noun’s role in the larger sentence remains separate
A person described through a relative clause can then act, receive something or be discussed in the main clause. Kim’s Japanese examples place the resulting noun phrase inside a larger sentence with its own grammatical organization. The description does not determine the head noun’s role in that larger event.
For this pair, identify the referent, the event used to describe them and the main event in that order. A Lower Sorbian case form may identify the noun’s main-clause role, while the relative clause supplies a separate action associated with it. Japanese must preserve both dependencies even though the description precedes its noun and a standalone relative pronoun is absent.
Language references