Lower Sorbian to Faroese: first-person self-reference does not use the third-person reflexive series
A source reflexive does not select a target form by itself
Lower Sorbian reflexive constructions can refer back to first-, second- or third-person participants. Stone illustrates myś se for washing oneself and describes the reflexive’s usual relationship to the clause’s subject. The Faroese PAROLE documentation identifies a special reflexive personal-pronoun series in the third person only. A translation therefore cannot map every source se to the same target reflexive word regardless of who acts.
A Lower Sorbian speaker reporting something done to themself and a speaker reporting something another person did to themself both present self-reference. Their Faroese expression must still distinguish first person from third person. Recognizing the shared meaning self is only the beginning of the analysis, not a substitute for identifying the participant.
Third-person forms also distinguish grammatical role
The Faroese documentation distinguishes seg in the accusative from sær in the dative. It discusses sín as a reflexive genitive in prepositional use and as a possessive in other constructions. Those forms are not interchangeable spellings of one general equivalent for Lower Sorbian se.
Stone notes that the Lower Sorbian accusative and dative reflexive forms do not differ in the way their Upper Sorbian counterparts do. This source overlap can therefore conceal a target decision. Determine whether the participant is directly affected, receives something or stands in another relationship required by the target construction before selecting the Faroese form.
For a Lower Sorbian statement about somebody obtaining something for themself, the item obtained remains a separate participant. A target expression appropriate for acting directly on oneself cannot be substituted merely because the source reflexive looks the same in both environments. The verb’s construction must establish which role the reflexive fills.
An owner inside a noun phrase is not always the affected participant
Stone separately describes the Lower Sorbian reflexive possessive. His discussion distinguishes an item associated with the subject from another possible owner. This is not the same as turning the entire action into something performed on the subject’s body or person.
The Faroese documentation likewise treats possessive use separately from personal-pronoun use. It illustrates mín hundur and mítt barn for my dog and my child, emphasizing that the grammatical gender belongs to what is possessed rather than the owner. A different possessive form therefore need not identify a different person.
When a Lower Sorbian source mentions the actor’s own item, preserve whose item it is before judging the shape of the Faroese possessive. Do not infer a male owner from a masculine possessed noun or choose a third-person reflexive merely because the phrase contains a sense of own. Participant person and possessed-noun agreement are separate dependencies.
An emphatic self expression adds a further distinction
The Faroese documentation notes that the reflexive series often occurs with sjálvur, which it analyzes separately. This is a reason to distinguish basic self-reference from an additional emphatic expression. A Lower Sorbian construction can identify the actor as the affected person without independently stressing that the actor acted personally or unaided.
Conversely, if the source does contrast the actor with someone else, merely preserving a reflexive relationship may miss that emphasis. Read the Lower Sorbian verb, its reflexive form and the surrounding contrast together. The useful target question is not which Faroese word means self in isolation, but which combination preserves person, grammatical role, ownership and any actual emphasis in this source sentence.
Language references