Greek to Serbian Cyrillic: στο can describe a place or a destination, but the target ending differs
The same Greek phrase accompanies different kinds of event
Greek στο σχολείο can occur in both Είμαι στο σχολείο, I am at school, and Πηγαίνω στο σχολείο, I am going to school. The phrase naming the school remains unchanged. Serbian distinguishes the destination construction from the location construction through case, so those source phrases do not require one identical target noun ending.
Larisa Zlatic’s locative-case lesson explains that u and na take the locative when describing a position, while the accusative serves a goal or destination. In Cyrillic, the familiar school contrast is у школи, at school, versus у школу, to school. The preposition remains recognizable while the noun’s ending establishes a different relation.
Movement inside a place is still located there
The distinction is not a rule that any sentence containing physical movement needs the destination form. Zlatic’s lesson includes moving or jumping within a location. The question is whether the named place is the goal reached by the action or the setting where it happens.
An original Greek message can say Περπατάω στο σχολείο, which may need context to distinguish walking to school from walking at the school. A corridor description and a journey description supply different readings. Serbian case should follow that intended scene, not merely the fact that walking is a movement verb.
For a parent arranging a pickup, Είμαι στο σχολείο reports the child’s location, while Πηγαίνω στο σχολείο reports a journey or a regular destination. Confusing у школи with у школу can therefore turn already being there into going there, or make a journey sound like a static location. The relevant distinction is in the whole message.
Greek case cannot be transferred by its name
The Greek contraction στο contains σε plus a neuter article form. Serbian locative is a target case category without an ordinary one-to-one counterpart in the Modern Greek case inventory described by Universal Dependencies. A Greek accusative-form complement after σε does not establish that the target must use the accusative too.
Zlatic also gives the locative example of books on a table. A Greek instruction to put a book on a table, by contrast, supplies a destination for the placement action. The final location may be identical, but the event structure differs: describing where books are is different from directing where a book should be put.
Her lesson notes that locative and dative endings coincide in Serbian. An ending’s resemblance to a recipient form is consequently not proof that the table or school has become a recipient. Interpret the preposition and the construction together rather than assigning meaning from the ending in isolation.
The Cyrillic examples here represent Serbian rather than a different grammar created by changing alphabets. Latin školi and školu correspond to школи and школу; the case distinction remains. Preserving it matters more than merely replacing Latin letters with Cyrillic ones, because a perfectly converted spelling can still express the wrong location or destination.
Language references