Greek to Arabic: two students require a dual construction rather than an ordinary plural
Modern Greek plural marking does not determine the Arabic number category
A Modern Greek phrase can identify two students with a numeral and a plural noun. Standard Arabic has a separate dual construction, so the translation must use the actual count rather than equating every Greek plural form with an Arabic plural referring to more than two. This distinction is practical in attendance lists, introductions, and instructions addressed to a pair.
The Modern Greek overview distinguishes singular and plural number in its nominal description. This is a description of the modern source language, not the dual forms familiar from Ancient Greek. A translation of a current message should therefore interpret an explicit two within the modern phrase instead of expecting an ancient-looking dual ending to be present.
The Arabic teaching lesson contrasts طَالِبٌ with طَالِبَانِ and طَالِبَةٌ with طَالِبَتَانِ in the nominative. The two target dual forms also retain the masculine or feminine noun distinction illustrated by the student words. The count and the noun’s gender are separate decisions; recognizing two does not remove the need to identify which student expression the source intends.
The case of the pair depends on its target role
The same lesson gives different dual endings for nominative versus accusative or genitive contexts. Its phrase مَعَ مُدَرِّسَيْنِ illustrates a pair of teachers after with. Consequently, an Arabic dual form copied from a dictionary-style subject example may be inappropriate when the same two people appear in a different relationship inside the sentence.
Imagine a Greek note distinguishing two students who arrived from two teachers accompanying them. Each group contains two people, but one group is the arrival’s main participant and the other appears in an accompanying phrase. The target must preserve both pairs without selecting the same ending merely because both source phrases contain two. The count does not make their grammatical roles identical.
Another possible mistake is to count the numeral against the wrong noun. Two students with a teacher describes three people arranged in two roles. Two students with two teachers describes four. An Arabic translation that automatically makes every nearby noun dual would enlarge the second group, while one that ignores the numeral would leave the students’ group size unclear.
The Greek source can also refer back to the pair with a plural-looking expression. That later reference should not silently expand the group beyond two when the same students remain intended. Conversely, a source which adds another student has changed the group, and its later target reference should not remain dual simply because the first sentence introduced a pair.
The Arabic examples here concern the Standard Arabic dual pattern taught in the cited lesson, rather than a claim that all spoken varieties mark it identically. For a Modern Greek message, establish the number attached to each noun, identify whether each pair acts or occurs within another phrase, and preserve any later change in membership. The target dual then represents the source count rather than replacing it with an unspecified larger group.
Language references