Danish to Basque: a recipient can affect the verb as well as the noun phrase
Keep the giver, the item and the recipient separate
Danish pronouns distinguish subject forms from forms used as objects or after prepositions. Sproget.dk illustrates a gift being sent to mig and explains that a pronoun following a preposition uses the relevant object form. That expression identifies the recipient; it is not another statement about the sender.
In Basque, a recipient can also be represented through agreement in the auxiliary verb. A Danish-to-Basque translation therefore needs more than recognisable words for the people and the gift. The verb form must fit the participants in the complete construction.
Before checking a handover message, identify who transfers the item, what is transferred and who receives it. Changing one of those roles can require changes elsewhere in the target sentence even when the same two people remain involved.
Basque auxiliary forms can encode several relationships
Itziar Laka’s grammar explains absolutive, dative and ergative agreement in Basque auxiliaries. Her giving examples contrast diat with didak while reversing the first-person and familiar second-person participants. The item stays a book; the person giving and the person receiving switch roles.
Those particular examples involve familiar hi and the male second-person forms described in the grammar. They should not be copied as a universal equivalent of Danish du, or used without checking the relationship and the relevant Basque form. The agreement contrast illustrates participant roles, not a recommendation to address everyone familiarly.
Laka also explains that dative noun phrases occur in constructions beyond straightforward recipients. Do not identify every dative-marked participant as somebody receiving a physical object. The meaning of the verb and the relationship it establishes still need to be read together.
An edited recipient requires a complete construction check
Imagine a Danish note saying that an organiser handed an award document to a participant. During editing, the writer changes the recipient from the participant to a representative collecting it on their behalf. The item and sender remain the same, but the Basque translation needs to reflect who actually receives it.
Distinguish the immediate recipient from the eventual beneficiary. Collecting a document for somebody else does not make the collector the award winner. If the Danish message supplies both roles, preserve both rather than allowing a single recipient expression to replace the entire relationship.
Next check a reply describing the transfer from the other person’s viewpoint. A recipient can say that the organiser gave the document, while the organiser can describe giving it to the recipient. A shift of speaker should not reverse the actual direction of the handover.
If the source is shortened by removing repeated names, make sure the personal references remain clear. Basque agreement can carry information that a Danish reader expects to find in separate words. Absence of a repeated standalone pronoun does not alone establish that the participant was omitted.
Finally, trace the finished account as a transaction: sender, item, collector and intended beneficiary. Verify the target noun phrases and auxiliary together. A locally plausible pronoun paired with an auxiliary representing different participants can misstate the handover even though the visible names and document title are all correct.
Language references