Czech to Kyrgyz: three apples does not need a plural suffix on apple
A numeral can already establish plurality
The Kyrgyz UD description contrasts бир алма, one apple, with үч алма, three apples. In the counted expression, the noun does not receive an additional plural suffix. A Czech reader should not interpret the unchanged noun form as evidence that the three apples have become one.
This differs from simply copying Czech number morphology. The target numeral identifies the quantity, while the noun follows the Kyrgyz counted construction. Adding a plural suffix to make the target look more visibly plural would not repair the translation; it would conflict with the documented pattern. Preserve the actual number without demanding that every noun visibly repeat it.
A Czech genitive after a numeral need not identify an owner
Czech UD illustrates Pět mužů hrálo karty, five men played cards. The numeral governs a genitive counted noun in this construction. The genitive does not mean that the cards or the action belong to five absent owners.
For an original Czech report about five parcels arriving, first recognize the quantity phrase as the participant in the arrival. A Kyrgyz translation should preserve five arriving parcels rather than introduce a possession relationship merely because the Czech counted noun has a genitive ending. The source case follows its numeral construction; the target noun’s form follows its own count and case environment. Matching the source case label mechanically would miss the phrase’s actual role.
A singular-looking predicate need not reduce the group
The Czech example combines the counted group with a singular neuter predicate. Kyrgyz UD separately explains that overt plural subjects can occur with a predicate lacking an explicit plural marker. These are different grammatical mechanisms, but both warn against reading the verb’s surface number as an independent headcount.
A Czech account naming five workers does not become an account of one worker because its quantified subject has singular agreement. Likewise, an appropriate Kyrgyz target need not add a plural verb marker simply to reassure a reader that several workers remain involved. Identify the counted subject and preserve its quantity before evaluating the predicate against target agreement rules.
The counted items and their owners can have different numbers
Kyrgyz UD explicitly distinguishes noun number from possessor number. A plural owner does not automatically mean several possessed objects, and several objects do not automatically imply several owners.
Imagine an original Czech collection note about three books belonging to one colleague and one book shared by several colleagues. The target must keep those two number relationships separate. A numeral controls the count of books, whereas possession identifies whose books they are. Carrying the source’s genitive counted-noun interpretation over as possession, or treating a possessor marker as an item count, would merge the two relationships. In this direction, preserving three is only part of success: the translation must also retain which thing is counted and which people own it.
Language references