Welsh to Tongan: distinguish a condition from a change into that condition
Being dry and having dried tell different stories
A Welsh update can describe the condition of an object or report how it reached that condition. Clothes being dry and clothes having dried may both matter to somebody collecting laundry, but the second description adds an event. Decide what the source actually claims before choosing the Tongan aspect marking.
The Welsh Foundation guide distinguishes bod constructions using yn and wedi with verb-nouns, while Canolfan Peniarth separately explains predicate yn before adjectives. These are different grammatical environments. Do not interpret every descriptive phrase as an ongoing action merely because it contains a familiar-looking linking element.
For a practical update, establish whether the writer observed a condition, watched a process or returned to find a changed result. The target should preserve the information available to the writer rather than supply a history inferred from the object’s present appearance.
The Tongan study contrasts ordinary state and change readings
Andrew Koontz-Garboden’s study contrasts Tongan property descriptions marked with ‘oku and with kuo. Its contextual examples distinguish observing dry clothes without prior knowledge from returning to clothes previously hung out wet. In the latter setting, a change-to-dry interpretation is appropriate.
The study gives ‘Oku loloa ho ‘ulu for describing somebody’s long hair and Kuo loloa ho ‘ulu in a context where it has grown longer. The property expression is shared, but the surrounding construction and context affect whether a change is communicated.
This is not a rule that kuo always means become. The paper also documents other perfect interpretations with additional context, including a state continuing since an earlier date. Review the whole sentence instead of treating either short marker as a complete translation of a Welsh tense label.
Preserve what an update tells its recipient to infer
Imagine a Welsh message from somebody checking costumes before a performance. The writer finds one set dry but has not seen it earlier. Another set was damp when left outside and is now ready. The translation should not automatically give both observations the same history simply because the final condition matches.
If the message only needs to say that a costume is ready to collect, a state description may meet its purpose. If it reports progress since the earlier check, the change is relevant. Preserve that distinction from the source rather than adding a progress report to make the message sound more informative.
The same review applies to cooling a room. Saying that it has cooled can describe an improvement without guaranteeing that it has reached the desired temperature. Check whether the Welsh message claims sufficient comfort, some reduction in heat or only the present condition. Those conclusions are not interchangeable.
Do not confuse a change of state with the person causing it. A message about clothes drying does not necessarily identify who dried them. Introducing an actor or deliberate action can add responsibility absent from the original.
Finally, read the Tongan update against the earlier exchange. What was known before, what is observed now and what change is actually asserted? That comparison is more useful than forcing an isolated Welsh adjective or perfect form into a fixed target equivalent, especially when the recipient is deciding whether preparation is complete.
Language references