Welsh to Thai: a classifier is not a second object in the request
Welsh mutation does not supply a Thai counting category
Canolfan Peniarth explains that Welsh nasal mutation follows the preposition yn meaning in, while predicative yn triggers a different mutation pattern. A changed source beginning can consequently reflect a grammatical environment without changing how many things the writer means.
Northern Illinois University’s Spoken Thai course introduces classifiers for counting items. Its examples distinguish counting oranges with bay and animals with tua in the course transcription. The target counting expression depends on what is being counted, rather than on whether its Welsh noun happened to appear in a mutated form.
For an original Welsh shopping request, an animal-related counting expression and a fruit-related expression can need different Thai classifiers even when Welsh presents both through similar sentence structure. Selecting a classifier by source spelling would overlook the target category. Conversely, an added classifier does not necessarily ask for an additional item alongside the named object.
Pieces and packages give different quantities
The Thai lesson distinguishes classifiers for individual items from units such as packages, lengths, and dozens. In its counting patterns, the named item comes before the numerical counting expression. The classifier contributes to how the amount is interpreted.
A Welsh writer asking for a quantity of material can distinguish a measured length from individual pieces of that material. A Thai translation should preserve that unit, rather than treat every number as a count of separate objects. If the source requests a package containing several items, translating the package count as the individual item count changes the order.
The Welsh Foundation guide’s request and future constructions can leave the requested noun phrase inside a larger question. The Thai counting phrase should remain associated with the requested item, rather than attach to a different noun mentioned nearby. A polite question can still contain an incorrect quantity if its classifier or unit belongs to the wrong object.
For an original Welsh purchase message, compare asking for two packages with asking for two individual pieces. The distinction remains even if both requests use the same action verb and describe the same product. More fluent target wording cannot compensate for changing what the number counts.
How many uses the same counting relationship
The NIU lesson explains that a how-many expression occupies the number position in the relevant classifier construction. Its question does not become an unrestricted request for the identity of the object simply because the numeral is no longer supplied.
In an original Welsh exchange, compare asking how many oranges are wanted with asking what the person wants to buy. The first already establishes the item and requests a quantity; the second requests the item’s identity. A Thai result must retain which information is missing.
The source question’s overall form and the counted noun therefore need to be interpreted together. Thai can preserve the quantity question through its number-word and classifier pattern without mirroring the Welsh sequence. Read the target as an item plus its counting relationship, checking whether it requests pieces, measured units, or an unknown amount of the established item.
Language references