Welsh to Sindhi: demonstrative agreement and a pronoun inside the word
This and these can change several parts of the statement
Welsh y ddau gae and y ddwy law express a counted pair with different numeral and mutation patterns. Sindhi also distributes grammatical information around a noun, but its demonstrative and predicate patterns must be read on their own terms. A Welsh numeral’s gender does not directly select a Sindhi demonstrative.
The Sindhi Language Authority contrasts هِيءُ قَلَمُ آهي, this is a pen, with هي قَلَمَ آهِنِ, these are pens. The change is visible across the demonstrative, noun and copular material. Looking for only one plural marker would miss how the target statement establishes its number.
For a Welsh description of one object followed by several objects, preserve that real quantity while rebuilding the Sindhi phrase. A change from آهي to آهِنِ is not a new lexical action; it belongs to the singular-versus-plural contrast in the documented sentences. The target can therefore alter several forms while retaining the same object category.
Gender and distance are separate dimensions
The Authority’s pronoun lesson distinguishes masculine and feminine third-person singular forms and presents near and remote alternatives. Welsh fe and hi can help establish personal reference, but a source sentence about this or that object also carries a spatial or discourse relation that must survive translation.
A Sindhi form should not be chosen solely because a Welsh noun is grammatically feminine or masculine. The target noun has its own agreement requirements. Conversely, recognizing the target gender does not decide whether the writer points to something nearby or refers to something more distant. Work out the source reference before interpreting the complete demonstrative phrase.
Recover the owner from the Welsh mutation first
Welsh ei ben means his head, whereas ei phen means her head: the possessive itself has the same spelling, but the noun’s initial consonant identifies a different owner. Before rendering such a phrase in Sindhi, recover that reference from the Welsh construction. Reading only ei and ignoring the mutation discards information before target-language grammar has even been considered.
The Authority’s historical Sindhi grammar describes attached pronominal affixes that do not themselves distinguish gender. A compact Sindhi possessive can consequently represent an owner without reproducing the masculine-versus-feminine contrast carried by the Welsh mutation. Where two possible owners have already been mentioned, retaining an explicit name can be more informative than assuming an attached person marker resolves the reference. This is about preserving who owns the head or other body part, not assigning the Welsh noun’s grammatical gender to Sindhi.
There is also a useful limit on this comparison. Welsh fy nhad and dy dad both use separate possessives with mutations. The historical Sindhi account restricts its first- and second-person noun attachments chiefly to human-related categories such as kinship and occupations, and excludes attaching the first-person plural to nouns in that pattern. The Welsh construction cannot therefore be converted into a universal Sindhi suffix rule. A family expression and a statement about our belongings require their own complete target constructions.
Language references