Welsh to Kashmiri: the finite verb does not occupy the same sentence slot
Welsh verb-first wording is not a Kashmiri order template
Canolfan Peniarth describes a neutral Welsh pattern in which the verb occupies the first main position, followed by the subject and complement. Its example Mae e yn gweithio means he is working: the finite form and the verbnoun are separate parts of the construction.
Omkar N. Koul describes Kashmiri as a verb-second language, with an exception for relative-clause constructions. His account allows a sentence constituent before the finite verb. A Welsh-to-Kashmiri translation therefore should not be rearranged merely to reproduce the initial Welsh finite form. The target has its own organization of the finite predicate and the material preceding it.
For an original Welsh report about a colleague working at a particular place, the colleague, activity, and location must survive translation. They do not have to remain in the same visual slots. Moving a Kashmiri verb to the beginning just to match Mae can disrupt the target structure without preserving any additional source meaning.
Second position refers to structure rather than word counting
Koul distinguishes verb-second languages from languages described simply as having a verb in the middle. In his explanation, a constituent can precede the Kashmiri finite verb, so the relevant unit is not necessarily one written word.
An original Welsh time expression can name a particular afternoon with several words. If that information is presented before the target finite verb, the translation should not be cut apart merely to make the verb the second item separated by spaces. A phrase can carry one temporal relationship even when it contains a modifier and a noun. The translator needs to preserve that relationship rather than isolate the first source word as a new topic.
The same applies when a full person description introduces the statement. A target phrase referring to the colleague from another department should not be split so that only colleague remains associated with the actor and the department becomes a separate participant. Word-count matching cannot establish that the event roles have been preserved.
A relative clause requires its own interpretation
Koul explicitly excludes relative-clause constructions from his ordinary statement of the Kashmiri verb-second pattern. Welsh Universal Dependencies separately recognizes relative constructions, including the relative marker a.
For an original Welsh message, compare a complete statement that a colleague is working with a noun description referring to the colleague who is working. The second may be embedded inside a larger request, such as asking that colleague to call. Imposing the same main-clause word order on both can obscure which clause supplies the request and which only identifies the colleague.
Identify each finite or verbal construction before editing the Kashmiri order. The main request, the description selecting its participant, and any stated time or place have different jobs. Preserving the Welsh meaning requires retaining those jobs while allowing each target clause to follow the construction appropriate to it, rather than applying one surface-order formula across the whole message.
Language references