Greek to Tatar: moving possessive information into the noun
Greek possession and Tatar possession distribute the same relationship differently
Greek can place a weak genitive possessive after a noun or use a stronger construction with an agreeing form of δικός. Tatar possession, as described by the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, can instead be marked by suffixes on the possessed noun. A Greek phrase containing a noun and a separate possessive therefore need not produce the same number of independent words in the target.
The Academy illustrates китабым for my book, китабың for your book and китабы for his or her book. These contrasts change the person associated with the book through the noun’s ending. They are useful when a Greek message distinguishes the writer’s book from the recipient’s: the target may encode that relationship within the noun rather than by retaining a separate Greek-style possessive word.
Owner gender is not the same as possessed-noun gender
Greek possessive constructions contain more than one source of agreement information. The strong possessive adjective agrees with the possessed noun, while the accompanying genitive form identifies the possessor. A change in that adjective’s gender should not be interpreted as a change from a male owner to a female owner. It can reflect a different noun belonging to the same person.
The cited Tatar third-person book example is glossed for either a male or female possessor. A Greek distinction between his and her may consequently be less explicit in this target form. That is not permission to confuse two people mentioned in the source. Determine which person owns the item from the Greek phrase, then retain sufficient reference in the surrounding target sentence when the suffix alone would not distinguish competing owners.
A genitive owner and a possessive suffix are different pieces
The Academy distinguishes genitive case from the possessive category in its noun description. The former can mark an ownership relationship on the owner expression, while the latter marks the possessed noun. A Greek genitive form should therefore not be treated as though it supplied a ready-made suffix to paste onto the equivalent Tatar noun. First identify the owner and the thing owned, then express their relationship through the target construction.
This is practical in instructions involving several belongings. A request about your book and my bag concerns two separate ownership links. If the source pronouns are exchanged while rearranging the phrase, the translation can select the wrong object even when both target nouns are correct. Interpret each Greek noun phrase as its own relationship before choosing the corresponding possessive form.
Possession is not the same as a noun predicate
The Academy separately describes nominal predicate endings, illustrating forms expressing that the speaker is a singer. These endings perform a different job from saying that a noun belongs to the speaker. Greek commonly expresses identity through a form of είμαι, so a translation must distinguish being someone from having someone or something associated with oneself.
A Greek self-introduction naming an occupation must not become a possessed occupation noun, and a label identifying the writer’s book must not become a claim that the writer is a book. Both relationships can involve first-person information, but that shared person is not enough to choose the construction. Preserve whether the source classifies a person or identifies an owner before selecting Tatar nominal morphology.
Language references