German to Albanian: a short clitic can carry two participant references
Ma is not one undifferentiated pronoun
German can express a recipient and an object in separate words, such as mir and es. The Albanian Universal Dependencies description analyses ma as a combination of a first-person dative clitic and a third-person accusative clitic. A compact Albanian form can therefore refer both to the person receiving something and to the thing involved. Fewer written words do not mean fewer participants.
In an original German request such as Gib es mir, the addressee is asked to give an already identified thing to the speaker. A suitable Albanian construction must retain that combination of roles. A short target form should not be interpreted as identifying only the speaker, nor should a translator add another object merely to create a visible word corresponding to German es. The clitic combination needs to be understood within the entire request.
A repeated recipient can be grammatical rather than redundant
The same account states that Albanian dative objects require clitic doubling in the constructions it describes, while accusative doubling can also occur but is optional. This means an explicit recipient and a referring clitic may coexist. German ordinarily does not require an extra mir-like element simply because a recipient noun phrase appears. A literal attempt to remove apparent repetition can consequently alter a well-formed Albanian construction.
Imagine a German permission statement naming a group of people who are allowed to do something. The Albanian example in the source includes both a dative clitic and an explicit dative pronoun. The two expressions do not announce two groups receiving separate permissions. They participate in one grammatical dependency. When checking the translation, establish who is allowed and what action is allowed; do not count each personal form as a new person or treat all repetition as needless emphasis.
Identical-looking material can serve a different function
The Albanian description separately identifies më as a particle used in adjective and adverb comparison. That function differs from the first-person dative component in a pronoun combination. German may use mir for a personal role and mehr or a comparative form for degree. The translator must distinguish these meanings from the target construction, rather than assigning every occurrence of the same Albanian spelling one German equivalent.
A German request to give something to the speaker and a comparison saying that one item is larger concern entirely different relations. The former assigns an object and recipient to an action; the latter compares a property. Misreading a comparative particle as a personal reference would invent a participant, while misreading a recipient clitic as degree would lose one. Follow the phrase around the form: a verb with its objects or an adjective/adverb comparison. This also explains why a word-by-word glossary can appear inconsistent even when each full Albanian sentence accurately preserves its German source.
Language references