Estonian to Yucatec Maya: a possession can specify what someone does with the item
Identify the relationship behind own
A workshop organiser can refer to a participant’s own supplies without explaining whether the participant bought them, made them or brought them for somebody else. Translating Estonian oma into Yucatec Maya therefore involves more than locating an isolated word for own. The relationship between the person and the item may matter to the target construction.
The Estonian basic-vocabulary dictionary describes pronominal oma as linking something to the actor themself, through belonging or association. Its examples concern taking one’s own bag and giving advice to one’s own brother. The second example is a reminder that the relationship need not be commercial ownership of an object.
Christian Lehmann’s discussion of Yucatec possession describes possessive classifiers that specify a relationship to an item. His water example contrasts classifiers associated with drinking, drawing and fetching water. These are different relationships to water, not merely three spellings for an interchangeable possessive word.
A container label should preserve the intended use
Imagine an Estonian organiser labelling supplies for a pottery demonstration. A participant has brought water for personal drinking, another has fetched water for the group, and a third has prepared clay figures. This is an original planning scenario. The labels should identify the intended supplies without turning drinking water into material assigned to a different task.
If the source explains who fetched the water and what it is for, retain those details. They help establish the relationship that a Yucatec possession expression may specify. If the source says only own water, do not invent a history of fetching or drawing it merely to justify a construction familiar from an example.
Lehmann also illustrates a made-item relationship with a possessive classifier in an example about a crafted figure. The useful principle for the pottery scenario is to distinguish making something from merely owning or carrying it. The grammar example does not establish that every object brought to the demonstration was made by the person who brought it.
Do not treat every possession as a detachable object
A family description requires a different check from a supplies list. Lehmann identifies kin terms among Yucatec relational nouns and discusses an older-brother expression used without an identified possessor. A form used for a family relationship is therefore not automatically interchangeable with a construction selected for consumable supplies.
In an Estonian account of somebody giving advice to their own brother, preserve whose brother is involved. Do not interpret the possessive relationship as ownership or replace it with the person receiving the advice if the actors differ across clauses. The dictionary’s association sense provides a better starting point than a narrow definition of belongings.
For the demonstration labels, check the person, the item and the stated relationship in that order. For the family account, check the people connected by the kinship term. Yucatec possessive patterns offer specific ways of representing relationships, while the Estonian sentence supplies the facts those patterns must preserve. A correct-looking possessive should never add an unsupported claim about who made, fetched or consumed something.
Language references