Estonian to Lower Sorbian: kahekesi identifies two people and can call for dual agreement
We two is more specific than a general we
Me tuleme kahekesi tells the listener that two people are coming together. Me tuleme can describe a group without specifying its size. Estonian uses plural person forms in both, but Lower Sorbian distinguishes singular, dual and plural. A translation should preserve the explicitly two-person group instead of treating it as an unrestricted plural.
Gerald Stone’s grammar describes the dual as a systematic component of Lower Sorbian number and identifies dual forms in both nominal and verbal morphology. This makes the count relevant beyond the independent word for two. Selecting a general plural verb and assuming a numeral alone conveys everything can miss target agreement.
Count the participants in the particular clause
Compare Me tuleme kahekesi with Me kolmekesi tuleme homme. The first identifies two travellers; the second identifies three. Reusing one Lower Sorbian number pattern would erase a distinction the Estonian speaker deliberately supplies. The time expression homme in the second sentence should not distract from the changed group size.
Kaks hobust is also a two-member group, while hobused leaves the number open beyond plurality. Stone’s Lower Sorbian example mam dweju konjowu describes having two horses and shows the form used for this animate direct-object construction. It is evidence for dual and case together, not a universal noun phrase to use in every sentence role.
The grammar explicitly distinguishes Lower Sorbian’s animate dual accusative pattern from Upper Sorbian patterns. A translator should not substitute a superficially similar Upper Sorbian two-horses example for the Lower Sorbian target. Related standards can differ precisely where the number and animacy information is being expressed.
Two people acting and one person addressing two people are different
Te tulete kahekesi addresses two visitors; Me tuleme kahekesi includes the speaker among the two. Lower Sorbian verbs distinguish person as well as number. A correct dual ending for the wrong person would still change who is expected to arrive, so both parts of the source need to be interpreted.
If an Estonian sentence lists Mari ja Jüri as the only people carrying out an action, it identifies two participants without the numeral kaks. The absence of an explicit number word does not make the group larger. Conversely, Mari, Jüri ja mina identifies three, even though two proper names appear before the speaker.
A later sentence can change the group again: Me tuleme kahekesi, aga mina lahkun varem. The arrival includes two people, while the earlier departure belongs only to the speaker. Lower Sorbian should not keep dual agreement mechanically throughout the message once the participant set changes. Tracking the actual group in each clause preserves the practical arrangement—who arrives together, who is addressed and who leaves—while using the target’s dual system where the Estonian meaning calls for it.
Language references