Dogri to Malayalam: a relationship can change the noun itself
Recognize the Dogri oblique before looking for its replacement
Sawhney’s Dogri description distinguishes a name’s form before a postposition from the name in isolation. Its example Ram-e=gi marks Ram as a recipient, while Rani=gi does not insert that same extra e. The relationship is comparable even though the names behave differently. A Malayalam translation must recover who receives something rather than preserve the Dogri name ending mechanically.
This matters in a delivery message that contains both the sender and the recipient. The source may identify the recipient through the name and its following marker. A changed ending in Malayalam is not automatically a misspelling of that name, but neither should every change be accepted as transliteration. Determine which material belongs to the name and which expresses its role in the transaction.
Malayalam case endings interact with their stems
The University of Texas sandhi lesson gives അമ്മ plus ഉടെ becoming അമ്മയുടെ, a possessive expression involving mother. A connecting sound appears where the elements join. The lesson also shows പണം plus ഇന്റെ becoming പണത്തിന്റെ. Here the stem changes more substantially. These are examples of a grammatical combination affecting spelling, not separate lexical replacements for the original nouns.
Dogri genitive da, de and di agree with the possessed head in the description. That source agreement should not be used to choose a Malayalam joining pattern. First identify the owner and the possessed item; then let the target construction determine the form of the owner expression. A feminine Dogri head does not by itself require one particular Malayalam linking consonant.
Consider a source note that contrasts money belonging to one person with an item sent to another. The two relationships must stay distinct even if both Malayalam expressions have a modified noun stem. Comparing their last letters alone cannot establish that ownership and receipt were preserved. A visible change can realize the required grammatical relation instead of corresponding to an additional content word.
A joined negative is a different kind of combination
The same Malayalam resource illustrates കണ്ടു plus ഇല്ല becoming കണ്ടില്ല, a negative statement about seeing. That joining does not express possession. The existence of sandhi therefore does not license interpreting every changed ending as a case marker or every uninterrupted string as a single simple dictionary word.
For a Dogri report about whether a recipient saw a document, keep the participant relationship separate from the polarity of seeing. The source recipient marker helps locate the person; the target negative construction determines whether the seeing happened. A translation can preserve the recipient perfectly and still reverse the report by losing the negative.
The practical distinction in this direction is between identifying a stem and interpreting the construction it enters. Dogri oblique forms already demonstrate that a familiar name need not remain unchanged before a grammatical marker. Malayalam extends the need for that attention through joining patterns: some indicate a noun relationship, while another can combine a predicate with negation. Read each through its actual function.
Language references