Dogri to Irish: does busy identify the woman or describe her situation?
Dogri adjective position must be read through the construction
Sawhney describes Dogri adjectives before the noun in attributive use and illustrates gender-related forms such as changa and changi. The same description discusses predicative adjectives on either side of a copula, where placement can affect emphasis. These are different questions: which noun receives a property, and how that property is asserted in the sentence.
For an original Dogri office message, distinguish identifying a busy colleague from reporting that a previously identified colleague is busy. The first uses the quality to help select the person. The second supplies information about the person’s present situation. A changed adjective position should not be interpreted without establishing which construction the source actually uses.
Sawhney’s observation about alternative copular positions does not mean that moving any adjective freely changes a description into a new clause. The source copula and noun phrase together establish the relation. That analysis is needed before interpreting the much smaller written distinction illustrated by the Irish target.
An Irish initial change can distinguish the two readings
Scannell contrasts Tá an bhean ghnóthach ina hoifig with Tá an bhean gnóthach ina hoifig. In his examples, the mutated property expression helps identify which woman is being discussed, while the unmutated counterpart predicates busyness of the woman in the office. Nearly identical content words therefore support different grammatical readings.
A Dogri translation can retain the woman, office and property vocabulary while choosing the wrong relationship between them. If the source reports where an already-described colleague is, the target should not turn that report solely into an assessment of whether she is busy. Conversely, a source report of her current busyness should not quietly use that condition merely as an identifying label.
The important target difference here is at the beginning of the adjective. It does not correspond mechanically to changing Dogri masculine agreement into feminine agreement. Both Irish examples concern a woman. The mutation contrast in the cited pair concerns the descriptive construction rather than a switch to a different participant’s sex.
Emphasis is not the same as changing the main assertion
Suppose the Dogri writer emphasizes that the colleague is busy because somebody has asked for immediate help. Preserving that emphasis requires retaining busyness as part of the asserted situation. A target that instead identifies the busy colleague and mainly locates her can answer where she is while failing to explain her availability.
Now suppose the source already distinguished the busy colleague from another colleague and simply reports that she is in her office. Turning that into a new assessment of her activity alters the report’s organization. The same vocabulary cannot establish that the target answers the same question.
For this direction, identify the Dogri noun modifier, the copular assertion and any emphasis separately. Then read the Irish adjective’s initial form within the complete phrase. The comparison is between the claims made about the same colleague, not between a source ending and an extra target letter. Scannell’s attested pair makes that small but consequential distinction visible.
Language references