Danish to Klingon Latin: hvis and result-clause så perform different jobs
The condition belongs to the verb that makes it possible
A Danish conditional can introduce the circumstance with hvis and then state what follows. Klingon expresses a real or possible condition with the verb suffix -chugh, as the Klingon Language Institute explains. Its contrast bIyIt versus bIyItchugh distinguishes “you walk” from “if you walk.” The conditional information is therefore attached to the target verb rather than supplied by a separate word in the position occupied by Danish hvis.
For a Danish instruction meaning “If you are tired, sleep,” the tiredness is the condition and sleeping is the advised response. Marking the sleeping action as the condition instead would ask for a different relationship. A translator must locate the proposition governed by hvis before choosing which Klingon verb receives the suffix. Matching the last verb in the Danish sentence is not a safe shortcut.
A fronted Danish clause changes the following word order
Danish main clauses can place their subject after the finite verb when another element occupies the front of the clause. That source order should not be interpreted as evidence that the result has become another condition or a yes/no question. In a sentence beginning with a conditional clause, the following result still says what happens under that condition.
The KLI lesson gives bIDoy'chugh yIQong! for its tiredness-and-sleep example and explains that the result and condition can also occur in the reverse order. The suffix continues to identify the conditional clause. Thus Danish “Sleep if you are tired” and “If you are tired, sleep” can preserve the same basic dependency while placing emphasis differently. Neither order permits the translator to drop the condition and turn the advice into an unconditional command.
Så can indicate a consequence rather than a point in time
The Klingon word vaj introduces a result, with meanings such as therefore or in that case. In a Danish hvis ... så ... construction, the relevant reading of så can similarly connect the consequence to the condition. It should not be confused with a chronological “then” that merely places a second event later. A Danish plan meaning “If the door opens, enter” differs from a report meaning “The door opened; then someone entered.” The first leaves the condition open, while the second asserts an event sequence.
The KLI also notes that vaj need not appear in every conditional result. Its absence alone does not prove that the relation has been lost if the conditional construction remains clear. More importantly, the lesson explicitly limits this -chugh treatment to conditions considered real or possible; counterfactual imagined situations require a different construction. A Danish sentence about what would have happened if someone had arrived is not interchangeable with an open plan about a possible arrival. Preserve that distinction before judging the Latin-script suffixes, whose capitals and apostrophes are part of the written Klingon forms.
Language references