Danish to Kashmiri: a dative-marked person may experience a feeling rather than receive an object
The person experiencing a state remains part of the meaning
Danish can describe a person’s state with a subject pronoun; Sproget.dk illustrates Jeg er glad. Its pronoun guide separately lists mig among object forms. When checking Kashmiri, do not assume that every non-nominative personal form must represent somebody receiving something or somebody affected by an external actor.
Omkar Koul describes a class of Kashmiri predicates whose subjects are dative-marked. He includes perception, knowledge, belief, mental and physical states, and desire among the relevant meanings. The form of the experiencer therefore needs to be interpreted within the predicate’s construction.
This is not a claim that every Danish statement about a feeling translates through one Kashmiri pattern. Identify the particular target predicate and its participants. The useful contrast is between grammatical marking and the role a person has in the described experience.
An experiencer and a recipient can share a case label
Koul’s examples distinguish Mohan giving a pen to Nasim from a sentence expressing that the speaker liked the addressee. A dative-marked participant occurs in both discussions, but giving involves a recipient while liking involves an experiencer. The label dative does not make the situations identical.
His grammar also explains that some dative predicates contain a thematic argument marked nominative, and that agreement can follow this theme. A changing auxiliary form therefore need not mean that the experiencer has changed. Check which participant controls agreement in that particular construction.
The grammatical description is more informative than a gloss of a personal form on its own. A dictionary translation such as to me can be a useful label without being the intended natural rendering of every complete Kashmiri sentence containing that form.
Keep an opinion separate from an action directed at somebody
Imagine a Danish participant describing a workshop. The person liked a presentation, wanted another discussion and later received a programme from the organiser. These sentences involve experience, desire and a transfer. The Kashmiri version should preserve those distinct relationships rather than interpret every similarly marked person as a recipient.
For the opinion, identify who holds it and what the opinion concerns. A sentence about the participant liking the presentation should not become a claim that the presentation pleased somebody else. A different arrangement of target case forms can still preserve the original experiencer if the construction is read correctly.
For the transfer, identify who handed over the programme and who received it. Do not carry an experiencer interpretation across the paragraph merely because the same participant appears again. The verb establishes a different event with a different set of roles.
If a later revision replaces the presentation with several activities, review the target agreement together with the thematic expression. Changing the item being evaluated may affect more than the noun phrase. Reusing an earlier auxiliary without checking its controlling participant can leave the revised sentence inconsistent.
Finally, compare the two versions by asking who feels or knows what, who wants which action and who gives what to whom. This role-based review helps a Danish reader evaluate the Kashmiri construction without forcing its dative-marked subjects into the object patterns expected from Danish pronoun labels.
Language references