Danish to Simplified Chinese: an action and its result can share one verb compound
Danish sig can identify who ends up in a condition
Danish sig refers back to the subject, as the Danish Language Council explains. In a source meaning “He cried himself tired,” that repeated reference identifies the person who becomes tired as the person crying. Mandarin can express an action and its resulting state through a compound without reproducing a separate word in the same position as sig. Losing the independent reflexive word therefore does not necessarily lose the relationship.
The Chinese treebank documentation illustrates this kind of result with 哭累: crying leads to tiredness. It describes resultative compounds as combining an action with a resulting activity or state of either the subject or the object. The crucial translation question is which participant acquires the resulting property, not whether every Danish pronoun has a visibly separate Chinese equivalent.
A result affecting an object is a different relationship
Compare “He cried himself tired” with a report meaning “I fell and broke my leg.” In the first, the person ends up tired; in the second, an affected body part is broken. The Chinese documentation illustrates both types of relation. A target resultative compound has to connect the resulting condition to the correct participant. A familiar-looking action word alone does not establish that the resulting state has been preserved.
This matters when a Danish report gives both a manner and an outcome. A statement about falling without injury is less specific than one reporting a broken leg. Removing a Chinese result component because it seems like a second verb can therefore erase the main consequence. Adding such a component to an ordinary fall, however, could invent an injury. Determine what outcome the Danish text actually asserts before selecting the compound.
Reaching a result differs from merely attempting the action
The documentation also illustrates 找到 in a question about finding a job. The first component concerns looking for something, while the second contributes reaching the result. A Danish sentence meaning “Have you found a job?” is not equivalent to “Have you looked for a job?” The first asks about success; the second can ask about an attempt. A Chinese translation should preserve that difference even if both target expressions share the same search-related character.
The resource further explains that 得 and 不 can occur inside these compounds to express positive or negative potential. Its example 行不通 describes something that will not work, rather than a literal journey that cannot pass through a place. Danish kan likewise needs interpretation in relation to the actual predicate: “cannot finish writing” concerns achieving completion, while “has not written” simply denies an action. Treat the compound’s result and potential marking as part of one construction. Simplified characters change the writing form, but they do not make a result component optional or turn an unsuccessful attempt into a completed outcome.
Language references