Bosnian to Slovenian: exact pairs and the purpose of a journey
Two participants can change more than the noun
Marušič and Žaucer describe productive dual marking in Standard Slovenian across nouns, adjectives, verbs and pronouns. A Bosnian message referring to exactly two people can therefore need a coordinated set of target forms rather than a numeral placed beside an otherwise unchanged plural phrase. Preserve the exact headcount wherever the source establishes a pair.
Their paradigm distinguishes hiša, one house, hiši in the nominative or accusative dual, and hiše in the plural. These forms illustrate why a Bosnian reference to two buildings needs more than an impression of plurality. The target must distinguish the pair from a larger set, while also using the case appropriate to the buildings’ role in the sentence.
A matching ending does not always reveal the count
The same study documents shared forms between dual and plural in some cases, including genitive and locative noun forms. Consequently, a Slovenian word that resembles a plural form is not by itself evidence that a Bosnian pair has been expanded into a group. Evaluate the numeral, modifiers and clause together before concluding that the translation has changed the number.
Bosnian genitives can also arise after expressions of measure, as Alexander explains. This source case must not be confused with Slovenian number interpretation. First determine whether the Bosnian phrase identifies exactly two things, an indefinite number of items or a quantity of a substance. Then inspect the target’s number and case as interacting grammatical choices rather than expect each visible ending to provide a separate unambiguous answer.
Going to do something has a special target form
Greenberg describes the Slovenian supine after motion verbs, contrasting it with infinitive constructions used with ability, obligation or intention. His paradigm gives kupiti beside the supine kupit. A Bosnian sentence about going somewhere in order to buy something therefore needs its purpose relationship interpreted before selecting the target form of the second verb.
The Bosnian textbook’s station dialogue combines going to the station with receiving somebody on arrival. In Slovenian, the intended reception should remain linked to the journey as its purpose. It is different from a second independent statement that somebody is travelling, or a claim that the visitor has already been received. A related Slavic verb can preserve much of the vocabulary while an inappropriate nonfinite construction changes how the actions fit together.
A short infinitive and a supine are not identical evidence
Greenberg notes that colloquial Slovenian often drops the final i of an infinitive, producing a short form that can resemble a supine. Thus, a Bosnian reader cannot identify the construction only by the absence of a final letter. The surrounding verb and the purpose meaning establish why the form appears. A spoken-looking target phrase is not automatically a misspelled version of the dictionary infinitive.
The dual study also specifies variation among Slovenian dialects and scopes its full paradigms primarily to the standard. A Bosnian couple’s spoken message may therefore be rendered with standard dual forms even if a local speaker uses another pattern. Keep the count of participants and the purpose of their trip stable while recognizing that standard morphology and every regional spoken realization need not coincide.
Language references