Bodo to Gujarati: keep ownership separate from possessed-noun agreement
The same owner can produce several Gujarati forms
Bodo expresses a third-person owner in bi-ni bizab, the cited example for that person’s book. The pronoun bi itself does not distinguish male and female. Gujarati possession introduces another question: what noun is being possessed? A target possessive can change because that noun changes, even when the owner remains the same individual.
The University of Pennsylvania lesson contrasts maro with a masculine mirror noun and marī with a feminine book noun. These are forms meaning my; the difference does not mean that the writer has changed gender. Gujarati also has a neuter possessive form. A Bodo writer listing personal items should therefore expect agreement to follow each target noun rather than demand one identical translation of the owner expression throughout the list.
The distinction becomes useful when correcting a generated sentence. If two adjacent possessions receive different-looking forms, check their nouns before concluding that the translation assigned them to different people. Conversely, repeating a single form beside every item can be wrong even though the source repeats the same owner.
A named owner does not remove agreement
Bodo’s short genitive marker identifies a relation, but Gujarati’s corresponding possessive morphology also responds to the following noun. The Penn lesson demonstrates this with Ramesh: its forms for Ramesh’s mirror and Ramesh’s book differ in the possessive ending. The person’s name remains unchanged in meaning.
For a Bodo message about a relative’s belongings, separate three pieces of information: the relative, the possession and the number of possessions. Gujarati plural patterns are not just a matter of adding a word meaning many. The lesson’s feminine possessive has the same form with a singular and plural book noun, whereas its masculine singular and plural examples differ. An unchanged possessive does not by itself prove that the number of objects was lost.
Bodo kinship expressions can also include the owner within the word: apha denotes my father in Basumatary’s account. That compact source expression still supplies an owner. It should not become a Gujarati phrase naming an unspecified father merely because there is no visibly separate Bodo possessive word.
Respect and a plural group remain different interpretations
Bodo distinguishes ordinary nɯŋ from the honorific second-person form nɯŋthang. Gujarati tame can likewise address one person politely as well as more than one person. A Bodo respectful instruction addressed to one elder should not be interpreted as an instruction to several elders solely because the Gujarati form has plural uses.
Penn’s Gujarati pronoun lesson also distinguishes inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns. This is a separate issue from respect: it concerns whether the listener belongs to the group called we. Basumatary’s Bodo discussion labels certain suffixes inclusive and exclusive, but the examples concern additive or restrictive focus, including only I. Those labels should not be used as evidence that a Bodo focus suffix automatically identifies Gujarati inclusive or exclusive we. Establish the intended group from the actual message before selecting that target distinction.
Language references