Bodo to Dari: distinguish a continuing state from an earlier completed action
Bodo more can concern the continuation of a state
Boro and Basumatary describe an adverbial suffix whose meanings include more occurrence of an event and continuation of a state. Their examples are context-sensitive: more reading increases the amount read, while another construction questions whether a formerly applicable state continues. A translator should identify which contribution the source actually makes.
For a maintenance update, distinguish someone doing more work from a condition remaining unchanged. The first concerns additional activity; the second concerns the persistence of a state. An English intermediary using still can hide that difference, especially when one sentence mentions an earlier repair and another describes the present condition.
Dari perfect wording can connect a past action to the present
Baker’s learner grammar contrasts a simple past account of shutting a door with a present perfect account that strongly suggests the resulting closed state remains relevant. His explanation treats this as a contextual implication of the perfect, not an independent guarantee that nobody has reopened the door.
A Bodo statement that work happened earlier and a statement that its result still holds should therefore not be collapsed casually. Choose the Dari construction in the context of what the sender wants the reader to understand now. A completed repair may be relevant even if a later sentence reports a new fault; retain that later qualification instead of allowing a polished perfect construction to imply an uninterrupted result.
A question about continuation need not request a neutral fact
The Bodo chapter includes rhetorical questions in its discussion of continued states. In those examples, the question challenges continuation rather than simply asking for information. A source writer can invoke an earlier state precisely to reject the suggestion that it remains applicable.
Read the surrounding exchange before turning such a line into a straightforward Dari status question. Is the sender asking whether a condition remains, expressing disbelief that it could remain, or stating that it has ended? Keep that communicative purpose distinct from the target’s event-time construction. A grammatically accurate tense does not by itself preserve the force of the message.
Compare the earlier action and current situation separately
For a practical review, note what happened earlier, what condition the sender describes now and whether the source explicitly connects the two. A door can have been shut and later opened. A person can have repaired a device that subsequently failed again. These scenarios illustrate why a prior action and a continuing result require separate evidence.
Then read the Dari paragraph as the intended recipient. What would that reader believe about the present condition? Does that belief match the Bodo update, including any doubt, contrast or rhetorical rejection? If an edit removes a time expression or a qualifying sentence, check the resulting implication again. The cited learner grammar distinguishes written forms from informal spoken pronunciation, so do not treat a transcription as a universal spelling prescription. Preserve the intended state and event relationship first, then check the target wording in the register the message requires.
Language references