Bodo to Bhojpuri: honorific reference does not change whose relative is meant
The kinship term contains an owner relationship
Basumatary’s Bodo study illustrates pronominal material in family terms, including ada for my elder brother and bida for his or her elder brother. A Bhojpuri translation must recover that family anchor instead of translating both as an unmodified elder brother. The person speaking is not automatically the owner of every relative mentioned.
Thakur’s Bhojpuri grammar documents हमार as my or mine. This provides a target way of anchoring a family expression to the speaker, but it should be used only when the Bodo source establishes that relationship. A report about another person’s brother should not become the speaker’s own family account merely because the kinship noun is familiar.
A respectful listener can be a different person from the owner
Thakur’s grammar distinguishes honorific रउआ in second-person reference and राउर as a respectful possessive form. A Bodo message politely addressed to one person should therefore preserve whether the belongings or relative discussed actually belong to that listener. Politeness toward the addressee does not automatically create second-person possession.
For example, a Bodo speaker may respectfully ask a guest about another person’s elder brother. The guest is the listener, while the family anchor belongs to the third person. In Bhojpuri, retain that distinction rather than select a respectful your form solely because a respectful address appears somewhere in the source.
The source honorific plural remains a real count decision
Basumatary distinguishes Bodo honorific singular pronouns from their plural forms. A Bhojpuri target must consequently preserve whether the message addresses one respected person or several. A source group should not be reduced to one person simply because both constructions contain respectful material.
Thakur’s documented Bhojpuri paradigm contains both singular honorific forms and explicitly plural expressions with लोग. Those forms belong to his described variety and should not be treated as a universal inventory for every Bhojpuri region. Use the source count and the intended target variety together when choosing a respectful group expression.
The verb must fit the intended relationship too
Thakur’s grammar discusses Bhojpuri verb paradigms varying with person, gender and honorificity in the patterns described. A Bodo honorific pronoun therefore cannot be translated fully by choosing a respectful Bhojpuri noun or pronoun while leaving an unrelated verbal form unchanged. The target construction should express the actual participant relation.
In a translated family enquiry, identify the person asking, the person addressed and the relative discussed. Then determine whose family anchors the relative and how many people each reference contains. These decisions prevent a common cluster of meaning changes: making a listener an owner, making another person’s brother the speaker’s brother, or interpreting a respected individual as a group. The Bhojpuri result should preserve the relationships expressed by the Bodo forms.
Language references