Bhojpuri to Klingon pIqaD: decide the ownership before changing the letters
The glyphs do not determine whether an owner is singular
Thakur’s Bhojpuri paradigm gives हमार as a singular first-person possessive and distinguishes singular हम from plural हमनी. A translation intended for pIqaD must preserve that ownership before a Klingon word is displayed in another script. A convincing glyph sequence cannot resolve an incorrect decision that the source means our rather than my.
Klingon expresses personal possession with noun suffixes. The KLI family lesson distinguishes my from our and also varies some possessive suffixes according to whether the possessed entity is capable of speech. Bhojpuri हमार by itself does not supply that target classification. The translated noun and the intended owner both matter.
A parent and an object use different personal-possession forms
In Latin reference spelling, SoSwI' means my mother, while paqwIj means my book. These short forms illustrate the grammatical distinction before pIqaD display: the possessive suffix associated with a speaking being differs from the object-associated form. They do not imply that the Bhojpuri owner has changed between the two phrases.
The KLI lesson also distinguishes personal possessive suffixes from a construction naming the possessor. HoD SoS identifies the captain’s mother through a noun–noun construction. When Bhojpuri uses a named possessor with a genitive relation, attaching an additional my or his suffix indiscriminately can introduce a reference absent from the original.
pIqaD represents Klingon, rather than substituting for translation
The KLI explains the history of the community mapping between Klingon sounds and pIqaD characters. Okrand’s Latin orthography is a separate writing convention from the glyph system used by the community. Rendering Bhojpuri letters with a Klingon-looking font would therefore leave the source language untranslated, even if its appearance resembled fictional signage.
The source must first become a Klingon expression with the correct ownership and structure. Only then can that expression be represented using the chosen pIqaD mapping. This is especially important for a source postposition such as के, which Thakur documents in multiple grammatical roles: a graphic substitution cannot decide whether it identifies an owner, a recipient, or an affected object.
Keep the distinctions carried by the reference spelling
The KLI’s alphabet explanation treats the apostrophe as a consonant letter and distinguishes q from Q. Multi-letter Latin sequences such as tlh likewise represent individual Klingon consonants. A display conversion must interpret those units, rather than map each Latin keystroke independently as though it were an unrelated letter.
Thus the apostrophe in SoSwI' is part of the possessive form, not disposable quotation punctuation. Losing it before conversion can destroy a grammatical distinction that was correctly chosen from the Bhojpuri source. The writing convention also normally runs horizontally from left to right, according to KLI usage; it does not require reversing the translated expression merely because the characters look unfamiliar.
Language references