Belarusian to Georgian: follow the whole predicate and its participants
Similar-looking endings can do different jobs
Belarusian uses inflected nouns and can form a nominal description without an overt linking verb. Georgian can attach grammatical material directly to a noun. The target’s written word may consequently contain more than its dictionary meaning, so compare the construction before judging whether the translation has omitted a word.
The Georgian UD description contrasts სახლში, saxlši, in the house, with სახლია, saxlia, is a house. Both contain the house stem, but one supplies a location while the other makes a statement. In a Belarusian address or property description, confusing these patterns would change the purpose of the whole phrase.
If the source identifies a building, the target must remain an identification. If it locates a person or object inside it, the target needs that spatial relationship. Translating the shared noun correctly cannot compensate for changing the connection expressed by its attached material. Check the item or person that the Belarusian clause is actually about.
A case name is not a permanent participant label
Belarusian UD describes nominative subjects, with additional possibilities under negation or quantification. Georgian participant marking interacts with its tense–aspect–mood series and verb patterns. A person who performs an action should not automatically be forced into nominative in every Georgian translation just because that case looked like the obvious source match.
The Georgian verb can also agree with objects as well as a subject. In a Belarusian request about giving or sending something to another person, review all participants together. Who sends, what is sent and who receives it are separate pieces of the message that may interact inside the target predicate.
Changing the target time or verbal construction can therefore require more than editing one auxiliary. Recheck the noun phrases and person marking after such a revision. A Georgian sentence assembled from a correct present construction and independently chosen past wording may no longer connect its participants correctly.
Not doing and not being able to do are different
The Georgian overview distinguishes არ, ar, not, from ვერ, ver, not able. A Belarusian negative statement needs to be interpreted before selecting the target expression. Did the person decline, fail to manage the action, or simply report that the action did not occur?
This distinction matters in ordinary arrangements. A Belarusian message explaining inability to attend should not sound like a categorical refusal if that is not what the speaker meant. Likewise, do not add inability where the source merely denies an action. Check what explanation, if any, the original actually provides.
Save complete Georgian constructions
A Georgian dictionary may present a verb through a verbal noun or a finite form rather than an infinitive directly comparable with Belarusian. Treat such an entry as a guide to the lexeme, not as a ready-made replacement for every occurrence of the source verb.
For this direction, useful saved phrases retain the predicate and its relevant participants together. A detached Georgian ending or dictionary headword is a weak model for a later message with different people or time. Review identification versus location, participant roles and the meaning of negation; these expose important differences that the alphabet change alone does not explain.
Language references