Azerbaijani past accounts and Pashto observer roles
The observer can have an oblique target form
Azerbaijani person and case endings identify who participates in an event through their own patterns. Pashto past transitive constructions organise case and agreement differently. A target form that looks like an object to somebody familiar with another tense can still identify the person acting.
The Pashto research contrasts first-person direct “ze” with oblique “maa”. In the illustrated past transitive environment, the oblique form can identify the observer. Its use does not automatically mean that the source I has become me as the person observed.
For an Azerbaijani account of meeting or seeing a colleague, label the observer and observed person before comparing individual words. Those roles must survive even where the target noun or pronoun changes case. A correct action root cannot repair a reversal of the people.
Second-person object marking is another construction
The same research contrasts direct “te” and oblique “taa” for second-person singular reference. In a documented present transitive sending construction, the latter identifies the person being sent. Oblique form alone does not assign one fixed role across every target tense.
An Azerbaijani source request about sending someone to an office should distinguish the sender, the person sent and the destination. The target form must fit the actual predicate. A pronoun learned as the actor in a past example cannot simply be reused as an actor in every present example.
This is why source case labels should be treated as evidence about the original relationship rather than instructions to select an identically labelled target form. The Pashto construction supplies its own role assignment.
Gender agreement may concern the affected item
Azerbaijani o and first-person predicates do not establish a male-versus-female agreement distinction by themselves. Pashto agreement can mark gender on constructions where the controller is an affected participant rather than the actor.
If an Azerbaijani report describes a man acting on an object with feminine target grammatical gender, a feminine target ending need not identify the man as female. Determine which participant controls agreement in the selected construction.
The original study also describes complications involving tense, aspect and compound predicates. A simplified rule that every past verb always follows the same single agreement pattern would overgeneralise its findings. Keep the specific event construction in view.
Source courtesy is not a case role
Azerbaijani siz can address a respected individual or a group. That social relationship does not establish whether the listener acts, receives something or is merely told about another person’s action. Identify the source role independently.
Both languages can place much of a clause before its predicate, but a familiar overall order does not guarantee matching agreement. Follow the participants through the source before judging the target sequence.
For this direction, check the logical actor, affected participant and destination or recipient, then inspect Pashto case and agreement together. This preserves the Azerbaijani event without interpreting one target oblique form as a permanent synonym for a single grammatical role.
Language references