Amharic to Persian: gender clues fade while social choices remain
A single Persian pronoun can cover two Amharic references
Amharic distinguishes እሱ, he, from እሷ, she. Persian او, u, can refer to either. This can make a perfectly grammatical Persian translation less explicit than the Amharic source about which person is meant, especially after a man and a woman have both been introduced.
Repeat the appropriate name when the reference changes. Do not try to repair the issue by inventing a gendered Persian pronoun or by switching the target to another language. The useful intervention is to preserve identity explicitly at the point where the source's masculine-versus-feminine contrast would otherwise disappear.
Addressing a person involves a different distinction
Amharic singular you has masculine and feminine forms. Persian تو, to, and شما, shomā, are not a corresponding male-and-female pair. Shomā is plural and is also used respectfully for a single addressee. Translating a source gender distinction therefore does not settle the Persian choice between familiar and respectful address.
For a message to a manager, customer, or relative, decide how much familiarity the Persian text should express before assessing its agreement. The addressee's gender and the relationship between writer and recipient are separate facts. Preserve both where relevant, but let Persian express them through its own normal choices rather than forcing the Amharic division onto its pronouns.
The connection in a noun phrase may be unwritten
Persian ezafe links a noun to a following modifier or possessor, and its connecting vowel is often not fully represented in ordinary spelling. A translated ownership phrase can therefore contain a grammatical connection that an Amharic reader cannot find by looking for a separate written word.
The university example ketāb-e man identifies my book: the item precedes the possessor in the phrase. Follow which item belongs to which person instead of preserving the source's sequence mechanically. If an Amharic list alternates between two owners' belongings, keep each owner's name with the relevant group of items so that the Persian chain does not encourage an unintended attachment.
Written and conversational Persian are different editing targets
The Persian teaching reference distinguishes ordinary written forms from colloquial spoken forms. An Amharic voice message being turned into a formal Persian notice therefore involves a register decision as well as language conversion. A conversational contraction should not automatically be copied into an institutional announcement merely because it sounds natural in casual speech.
Choose the intended medium first: a private chat, a spoken reply, or a public written statement. Then review the Persian for consistent address and a consistent written or conversational level. For this direction, those decisions work together: a translation can keep every factual detail yet still confuse the relationship by combining overly familiar address with unexpectedly formal wording, or by relying on gender clues Persian does not supply.
Language references