Amharic to Maithili: respectful agreement is part of the message
Listener gender and social relationship are separate decisions
Amharic distinguishes masculine and feminine singular listeners in forms such as አንተ and አንቺ. Maithili has an elaborate system of honorific distinctions in reference and verbal agreement. A source form that identifies a listener's gender does not settle how that listener should be addressed socially in the target.
The Tribhuvan University study describes high-honorific, honorific, mid-honorific, and nonhonorific distinctions. Treat these as grammatical relationships, not a menu of decorative polite words. For an Amharic message to an elder or a professional, establish the intended relationship before evaluating the Maithili verb forms that accompany the address.
An honorific addition can have consequences elsewhere
The study illustrates a name followed by ji as an honorific form, including Ram-ji. It also gives an occupational-title example involving doctor and saheb. These are analytical Latin transcriptions of the cited constructions, not a prescription to write an ordinary Maithili message in Latin letters.
Do not add such material to an Amharic person's name merely because the result sounds more respectful. An honorific decision can interact with agreement, and the social relationship may not call for the same form in every setting. Preserve the actual name while allowing the Maithili construction to express the appropriate level consistently.
A verb may mark respect toward someone beyond the subject
Research on Maithili possessor agreement shows that agreement can be sensitive to a possessor in the clause. This is not the same distribution as simply reading Amharic subject agreement and attaching a target ending for that subject alone. Several socially relevant participants can occur in one sentence.
For a message about an elder's belongings, distinguish the elder who owns the item from the younger person carrying it. Keep ownership explicit in the Amharic source. Otherwise a translation check that asks only who performs the action can miss why the target contains an honorific agreement choice associated with another person.
A bare noun or pronoun is not enough for review
Maithili nominal grammar includes number, case, honorificity, and classifier behavior. The same source-side person can appear in different target constructions as the recipient, owner, or actor. A vocabulary lookup of a pronoun does not verify the complete phrase used in that role.
When checking an Amharic request, map the participants to their roles and social relationships before changing a Maithili form. A name repeated after a change of actor can make those relationships clearer than a string of source pronouns. Then review the target as one clause: does the right person receive the instruction, does the item belong to the intended owner, and is respect maintained throughout? Those questions test the actual translation rather than the superficial presence of a polite expression.
Language references